This article has been written by Ms. Amrutha Selvam, an LLB student at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala.

Introduction

Patent infringement is a major concern for patent holders and is a violation of the exclusive rights granted by the government to a patent holder. In order to be considered an infringement, the accused product or process must be identical or substantially similar to the claimed invention in the patent. Remedies for patent infringement include injunctions, damages, and destruction of infringing goods.

What is Patent Infringement?

Patent infringement occurs when someone makes, uses, sells, or imports a patented invention without the permission of the patent owner. This can include manufacturing a product that utilizes the patented invention, selling or importing a product that incorporates the invention, or using the invention in a process. In order for an infringement to occur, the accused product or process must be identical or substantially similar to the claims of the patent in question.

Patent infringement can be a complex issue, as it often involves intricate technical and legal considerations. One important factor to consider is the scope of the claims of the patent in question. The claims define the boundaries of the invention and specify what is protected by the patent. In order to determine whether infringement has occurred, it is necessary to compare the accused product or process to the claims of the patent. Another important factor to consider is the level of intent required for infringement. In some cases, infringement can be found even if the accused infringer did not intend to infringe on the patent. This is known as “strict liability” infringement. However, in other cases, intent must be proven in order for infringement to be found. This can include showing that the accused infringer knew or should have known that their actions would infringe on the patent.

Additionally, it is important to note that there may be defenses to patent infringement. For example, an accused infringer may argue that the patent is invalid or that their use of the patented invention is protected by a legal doctrine such as fair use or exhaustion. These defenses can be complex and may require a detailed analysis of the facts and applicable law. Overall, patent infringement can be a complex issue that requires a thorough understanding of the patent laws and the specific facts of the case in question. It is important for anyone accused of infringement to seek legal advice in order to fully understand their rights and options.

Factors for determining Infringement

Patent infringement occurs when a third party, without the patent owner’s permission, makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, or imports into the country a patented invention. Determining whether infringement has occurred can be a complex process, as it involves evaluating a number of different factors.

One important factor in determining infringement is the scope of the claims in the patent. The claims define the boundaries of the patented invention and set out what is protected by the patent. In order to prove infringement, it must be shown that the accused product or process falls within the scope of at least one of the claims of the patent.

Another important factor is the level of similarity between the accused product or process and the patented invention. The greater the similarities, the more likely it is that infringement has occurred. This can be determined by comparing the accused product or process to the claims of the patent, as well as looking at any prior art that may be relevant to the patent.

Additionally, the level of intent of the accused infringer can also be a factor in determining infringement. In some cases, an accused infringer may have knowledge of the patent and still choose to infringe it. This can be used as evidence of intent to infringe, which can strengthen a case for infringement.

In addition to these factors, courts may also consider the commercial success of the accused product or process, whether the accused infringer has profited from the infringement, and whether the infringement has caused any harm to the patent owner in determining infringement. It is important to note that these are just some of the factors that may be considered when determining infringement, and each case will be evaluated on its own unique facts and circumstances. Furthermore, it is always advisable to consult with a legal professional with expertise in patent law to fully understand the nuances and complexities of patent infringement.

Remedies for Infringement

When a patent is infringed, the patent holder has a number of options for seeking relief. The most common remedies for infringement include monetary damages, injunctive relief, and attorney’s fees.

Monetary damages refer to the compensation awarded to the patent holder for any financial losses suffered as a result of the infringement. This can include lost profits, reasonable royalties, and any other costs incurred by the patent holder. In determining the number of damages to be awarded, courts will consider a number of factors such as the nature of the infringement, the profitability of the infringing product or service, and the extent to which the infringement has harmed the patent holder’s business.

Injunctive relief is a court order that prohibits the infringing party from continuing to infringe on the patent. This can include an order to stop manufacturing, selling, or importing the infringing product or service, or to cease using a process that infringes the patent. Injunctive relief is typically sought when monetary damages alone are not sufficient to compensate the patent holder for the harm caused by the infringement.

In addition to monetary damages and injunctive relief, patent holders may also be entitled to attorney’s fees. This is particularly relevant in cases where the infringement was found to be willful or in bad faith.

Other remedies that may be available in cases of patent infringement include account of profits and specific performance. Account of profits is an equitable remedy, where the infringing party is ordered to pay over to the patentee any profits made from the infringing activities. Specific performance is a rare remedy, where the infringing party is ordered to take certain steps to bring their activities into compliance with the patent.

It is worth noting that the availability and scope of remedies for infringement of a patent will vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. It is important for patent holders to consult with experienced legal counsel in order to understand the remedies that may be available to them in the event of an infringement.

Defenses to Infringement

There are several defenses that a defendant can raise in a patent infringement lawsuit. These defenses include:

1. Invalidity: The defendant can argue that the patent is invalid, either because it was not novel or non-obvious at the time of its filing, or because it was not properly described in the patent application. This defense can be raised regardless of whether the defendant has actually been accused of infringement.
2. Prior art: The defendant can also argue that the patent is invalid because the invention was already known or used by others before the patentee filed the patent application. This defense can be raised if the defendant can show that the invention was already in public use, on sale, or described in a printed publication before the patentee filed the patent application.
3. Non-infringement: The defendant can argue that they have not actually infringed the patent, either because their product or process does not fall within the scope of the claims of the patent or because they have a license to use the patent.
4. Equitable defenses: The defendant can also raise equitable defenses such as estoppel, laches, and unclean hands. These defenses are typically raised when the defendant believes that the patentee has acted unfairly or inequitably in relation to the patent.
5. Exhaustion: The defendant may also argue that they have a right to use the patented invention because they purchased it from the patent holder or an authorized distributor and the patent holder is not entitled to control post-sale use of the patented product.

It is important to note that the burden of proof in raising these defenses lies with the defendant, and they must provide evidence to support their claim.

Similar Case Laws

• In the case of eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, the Supreme Court held that a permanent injunction should not be granted as a matter of course in every case in which a patent has been found to be infringed
• In the case of Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc, The Federal Circuit clarified the standard for indirect infringement
• In the case of Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A, the Supreme Court clarified the standard for induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).

Conclusion

• Patent infringement is a serious issue and can result in significant financial loss for the patent holder.
• Patent holders can seek various remedies such as injunctions, damages, and destruction of infringing goods.
• There are also several defenses that can be raised by the accused infringer, such as invalidity of the patent or non-infringement.
• It is important for individuals and companies to be aware of their rights and responsibilities under patent law to avoid infringement and potential legal action.

Reference

• https://www.myadvo.in/blog/patent-infringement-india-types-cost-remedies/
• https://lawbhoomi.com/infringement-of-patents-and-remedies-for-infringement-of-patents/
• https://blog.ipleaders.in/concept-patent-infringement/

Aishwarya Says:

Law students often face problems, which they cannot share with their friends and families. We have started a column on our website Student’s Corner. In this column we are talking to several law students about the challenges that they face. Students who are interested in participating in the same, can fill this Google Form.

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME, DO LET ME KNOW.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems to aishwarya@aishwaryasandeep.com

Join our  Whatsapp Group for latest Job Opening